Your browser is currently set to block cookies. Not all features of our website will work as intended. Please turn on cookies or check if you have another program set to block cookies to allow full website functionality.
The Trouble with Target Date Funds
TDFs: One Size Does Not Fit All
Target Date Funds don’t account for differences in individual circumstances among investors, even when much of the pertinent data is readily accessible.
The below illustration shows three 50 year-olds with three very different financial situations. It shows how the PRO solution would determine their asset allocation compared to an average TDF which would lump three very different individuals into the same asset allocation.
Looking inside Target Date Funds:
- Inefficient portfolios which on average are constructed of over 20 sub-funds and contain over 2,000 equity holdings
resulting in a very low tracking error, index-like portfolio priced more like an actively managed strategy.
- High degree of security overlap - on average 35% of underlying securities are held in multiple funds resulting in a
very uncoordinated portfolio management.
- Uncoordinated trading as the same holdings are bought and sold by different sub funds.
- Portfolios tend to have a home bias with an average of only 25% allocated to international equity markets, which
now represent nearly 50% of the world’s equity investment universe.
- Portfolios often lack tactical decision-making and employ static allocations to fixed income and equities, further
limiting ability to control risk and generate excess return.
©2023 Fisher Asset Management, LLC, doing business as Fisher Investments. Investing in stock markets involves the risk of loss. Intended for use by employers considering or sponsoring plans; not for use by plan participants.